I'm not sure it's that clear cut. Harrowhark's power wasn't foolproof, like if someone else had used it. There's a margin for error, and unfortunately we don't know where that margin lies. Both she and I apparently had the same assumptions about it, and we were wrong.
Which would mean someone still did kill her, and is running around just fine. I'm not a fan that we keep falling back on this moral dilemma of "do you judge people for things they might have but didn't do", but this one feels a little different.
Probably why, if all this theorising is correct, it was accepted as a correct answer.
Mm, I think this one is different since it's an action taken place here, and Misa didn't back out on her own. If she got away with it this time, she could have just tried again next week.
Apparently her wish was something she wanted to get at all costs.
But it's just why I couldn't really listen to any of the people who kept insisting she would never murder. Even if she wasn't the cause for Eleanor's death, it was still untrue.
no subject
Which would mean someone still did kill her, and is running around just fine. I'm not a fan that we keep falling back on this moral dilemma of "do you judge people for things they might have but didn't do", but this one feels a little different.
Probably why, if all this theorising is correct, it was accepted as a correct answer.
no subject
Apparently her wish was something she wanted to get at all costs.
no subject
... Her, and many others I expect.
no subject
But it's just why I couldn't really listen to any of the people who kept insisting she would never murder. Even if she wasn't the cause for Eleanor's death, it was still untrue.
no subject
no subject
Well, we'll just have to see if anything comes up after this.
no subject