![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
It's risky, but so is murdering someone for extra indulgence points. If you do that you're already firmly in the "risky business" zone.
Wonder why he was so quick to be accusatory. [ not that, y'know. yuri has any clue how his mind works, especially after what came out at trial. ] I can see why people were suspicious of him for that, but it was still something of a leap.
Wonder why he was so quick to be accusatory. [ not that, y'know. yuri has any clue how his mind works, especially after what came out at trial. ] I can see why people were suspicious of him for that, but it was still something of a leap.
He's always been odd. When he announced that Grell was Jack the Ripper, the way he talked about it was creepy.
[ fukuda is going to die tomorrow but sasazuka will talk shit. ]
People probably thought he was trying too hard to pin the blame on someone else. Or maybe they just didn't like him, so thought he was a safer person to vote out.
[ fukuda is going to die tomorrow but sasazuka will talk shit. ]
People probably thought he was trying too hard to pin the blame on someone else. Or maybe they just didn't like him, so thought he was a safer person to vote out.
Odd, sure. Odd doesn't equate to "definitely killed someone here" though. Although who knows, maybe he'll admit something tomorrow, if he did kill someone last week.
... We're running out of people to blame, you know. That's just going to make our voting even messiers, assuming half of us vote at all.
[ he's not stupid enough to think that people aren't bending over backwards to avoiding voting for the people they like. ]
... We're running out of people to blame, you know. That's just going to make our voting even messiers, assuming half of us vote at all.
[ he's not stupid enough to think that people aren't bending over backwards to avoiding voting for the people they like. ]
Well, at the very least it took out someone who we know has a chance of murdering. It's not ideal, but I have no shame in saying I'd rather get rid of a serial killer than someone who actually hasn't killed at all.
[ like, you can come up with reasons as to why someone might have to kill. it is extremely fuckin hard to come up with a valid reason for a serial killer whose reasoning seems to be "well i liked it when i got a hole in my head" ]
But you're right. And I don't think we can really count on the idea of absolutely everyone abstaining, when the killers can vote as well.
[ like, you can come up with reasons as to why someone might have to kill. it is extremely fuckin hard to come up with a valid reason for a serial killer whose reasoning seems to be "well i liked it when i got a hole in my head" ]
But you're right. And I don't think we can really count on the idea of absolutely everyone abstaining, when the killers can vote as well.
I don't disagree with that, but assuming guilt based on things a person has done back home makes for murky waters. [ ... ] That being said, better now than after someone shows up with a hole in their head one week.
[ it might've been medb given that fight mid-trial and honestly? very funny that we're cucking ara again. ]
Oh, the killers will definitely vote. There's no reason not to, for them.
[ it might've been medb given that fight mid-trial and honestly? very funny that we're cucking ara again. ]
Oh, the killers will definitely vote. There's no reason not to, for them.
Mm, I think it's less assuming that they're guilty here because of what they did before, and deciding who you're personally willing to vote off. Everyone will have different reasons for who they choose if we don't have someone who's a clear suspect. I can't blame someone if their choice is based off of who's more obviously like to have no problems with killing.
[ hk was obvious. fukuda is obvious. grell also was obvious, but she died first. ]
[ hk was obvious. fukuda is obvious. grell also was obvious, but she died first. ]
Yet, as our numbers drop that line of thinking is going to get murkier. The less of us there are, the better we have to do, otherwise our votes are going to be an unmitigated disaster.
...
If two or more people get the same number votes, I have to wonder what will happen.
...
If two or more people get the same number votes, I have to wonder what will happen.
-- We also came across this possibility last week, but what happens if the person voted for survives the execution?
It's possible. And then there's always a chance they'd seek revenge depending on who they assumed voted for them, depending on the sort of person they are.
[ case in point: it'll be really awkward if Fukuda survives today, wow! ]
It's possible. And then there's always a chance they'd seek revenge depending on who they assumed voted for them, depending on the sort of person they are.
[ case in point: it'll be really awkward if Fukuda survives today, wow! ]
Edited 2021-02-28 15:09 (UTC)
Yeah. I think if Endorsi won the first time, no one would have really blamed her, especially since she and Beauregard both agreed to fight for it. On the other hand, the robot wouldn't have left the room alive.
[ although he wouldn't be surprised if hk would have managed to take other people out first. that was a very strong murderbot. ]
I don't know what to expect for Fukuda.
[ although he wouldn't be surprised if hk would have managed to take other people out first. that was a very strong murderbot. ]
I don't know what to expect for Fukuda.
Page 22 of 43